Stan,
Is it possible to implement a Simulation functionality for segment combinations which would be connected to My Estimates for Segment Combinations? Both would would be arranged similarly to the Simulation and My Estimates for Differences.
In the Simulation histogram (separate for each level) on the horizontal axis there would be segment combinations from 5-0-0 to 0-0-5 (21 of them) for 5/xy lottery or
from 6-0-0 to 0-0-6 (28 of them) for 6/xy lottery. The hight of vertical bars would be proportional to the occurrences of segment combinations in the package. In my 5/45 game the occurrences of segment combinations in full package can vary from 0.00% to approximately 22.00%.
It would be possible to select in the histogram a range of segment combinations for each level, for example, the range from 2-0-3 to 4-1-0 (it would include combinations 2-0-3,
2-1-2, 2-2-1, 2-3-0, 3-0-2, 3-1-1, 3-2-0, 4-0-1, 4-1-0), and transfer it to My Estimates, and later to the segment combination filter for all levels. It would be also possible to transfer single segment combinations to My Estimates.
In the segment combinations filter for all levels which would be included in My Estimates there would be an option: "At least x to y levels must pass" as well as a selectable option: "The segment combinations in a to b levels are from ..... to ....." with the possibility of adjusting the range of combinations (even the single combination range should be possible).
With such arrangement of Simulation/My Estimates it would be possible to reject a numer of combinations based on repeats from the latest drawing (enter all latest segment combinations in appropriate levels in the filter and specify how many levels should pass). In my game (5/45) when I use 76 levels there are repeats from previous drawing in 5 to 9 levels, most commonly in 9 levels, but of course I cannot predict in which levels the repeats would occur.
It would be possible to remove only the segment combinations with occurrences below 1.00%. When I filter 76 levels with the segment combinations filter available in the Analyzers and reject combinations with occurrences below 1.00%, it removes enormous number of tickets. Unfortunately, this approach can be successful only several times per year (but maybe it's a proper way to hit a jackpot).
Usually, several winning segment combinations in 76 levels have occurrences below 1.00%. New filter would give us the option "At least x to y levels must pass" to address this problem. Similarly, it would be possible to target the highest occurrences of segment combinations, for example, above 13% to 15%. Very often the winning segment combinations have the highest occurrences within a level, but not always. And sometimes 2 or 3 segment combinations within a level have exactly the same occurrences, but only one of them can be a winner.
Implementation of such filter could be difficult and might take time, but I believe it is worth doing.